"Challenges in Human Review Resulting in Passage of Low Quality Content"
Poor content can occasionally avoid human inspection for a number of reasons, including:
Human error: Because they are only human, reviewers occasionally misjudge or fail to notice low-quality content.
Limited resources and time: Reviewers might not have the time to thoroughly examine every piece of information, or they could lack the tools (such subject knowledge) to spot low-quality content.
Lack of clear rules: It may be challenging for reviewers to appropriately assess and reject information because they lack clear guidelines on what constitutes low quality content.
Lack of clear rules: It may be challenging for reviewers to appropriately assess and reject information because they lack clear guidelines on what constitutes low quality content.
Varied reviewers may have different criteria for what constitutes low-quality information, which could cause inconsistent outcomes.
Reviewers may feel under pressure to accept content in order to keep up with demand or achieve production targets, which could cause them to overlook subpar material.
The sum of these elements can make it challenging for human reviewers to recognise and reject low quality content with accuracy.